Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Through political action, legal, academic and market research, and grassroots initiatives, TLR fights for common-sense reforms that keep Texas open for business.

  • About TLR
    • Our Mission
    • Our Team
    • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
    • Special Reports
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • The Advocate
    • TLR Blog: For the Record
  • Get Involved
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
In the News

Appeals court rejects $685K in lawyer fees on $1 Lemon Law judgment

Legal Newsline, February 2, 2022

A California appeals court reversed an award of $685,000 in fees for a lawyer who won his client $1 in a complicated dispute over a leased Jaguar.

Saying it was time to revisit its liberal interpretation of the law allowing plaintiffs to recover outsized legal fees under California’s “lemon law,” the Fourth Appellate Division sent the fee request back to trial court for another look.

Ken Duff and his lawyer Michael Lindsey sued Jaguar Land Rover after Duff had to take his leased vehicle back to the dealer multiple times for repairs, including a complete engine replacement. He sued Jaguar in January 2016, while it was undergoing its final repair, claiming violation of the Song-Beverly Act, which allows car buyers to recover legal fees and even double damages if defective products aren’t repaired in a timely manner. Despite his complaints, Duff bought the car at the end of its lease period.

The trial judge found Jaguar had violated the implied warranty provision of Song-Beverly but awarded Duff only $1, saying he hadn’t suffered any damages as a result. Lindsey claimed Duff was the “prevailing party” under the law and he was entitled to $939,700 in legal fees at $650 an hour plus $22,900 in costs. Lindsey said the fees were high because Jaguar had litigated aggressively, including causing repeated trial continuances.

Jaguar urged the judge to reject the fees and award it costs because it had offered Duff $28,500, and possibly more, for the car before trial. California law allows defendants to recover legal costs when a plaintiff rejects their settlement offer and goes on to win less at trial.

The trial judge rejected Jaguar’s motion, however, saying the offer to buy Duff’s car was “not sufficiently specific” because the company said it might increase the offer if Duff established certain facts. The judge noted that Jaguar had argued the case should have been handled in small-claims court and in a hearing said “this should have been a relatively simple case.”

“It wasn’t treated as a simple case” by Duff or Jaguar, however, the judge said, noting that Jaguar filed more than 20 motions. He cut the lawyer’s hourly rate to $575 from $650 and the billable hours to 1,190 from 1,505, bringing the total to $684,250.

In a Jan 27 decision, the Fourth District appeals court reversed the fee award, saying the judge misinterpreted the Song-Beverly Act. The appeals court acknowledged its definition of “prevailing party” was more liberal than a majority of California courts but said that didn’t mean plaintiffs were entitled to legal fees regardless of how little they recover under the Song-Beverly Act.

To reduce confusion in future, the court said it was adopting the more “pragmatic” approach of other courts by assessing whether the plaintiff achieved his goals through litigation, rather than whether he won anything at all.

“Although we do not shy away from standing alone if we believe our approach to the law is correct, we believe the pragmatic approach of determining whether Duff prevailed in his Song Beverly action is the more sound one under the unique facts of this case,” the court concluded.

“Mechanically awarding attorney’s fees to a buyer is not the purpose of the Act.”

The court remanded the case to trial court to reconsider whether Duff is entitled to any fees at all. The court said the ruling had no effect on its interpretation of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1032, which defines “prevailing party” as whoever achieved a “net monetary recovery.”

Follow us on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

24 hours ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

The Dallas County DA argued a judge’s impartiality could reasonably be questioned after she lowered a defendant’s bail considerably while his defense lawyer is one of her top campaign contributors, and then raised his bail after media reports about her rulings. Read and share: bit.ly/3lfQMzM ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Dallas judge under scrutiny for bail rulings recuses herself from cases

bit.ly

Judge Chika Anyiam, of Criminal District Court 7, recused herself Monday from 10 felony cases against Julio Guerrero. A Dallas County judge who faced public scrutiny for lowering a murder suspect’s ...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 2
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 1

Comment on Facebook

Tar And Feather

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

2 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

TLR General Counsel Lee Parsley joined the U.S. Chamber’s Institute for Legal Reform’s podcast to discuss nuclear verdicts in the trucking industry and what legislators can do to ensure that excessive lawsuits don't shut down this vital industry. Listen and share: bit.ly/3wjgKJ9 #trucking #lawsuit #LegalNews #courts ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Nuclear Verdicts Create Litigation "Vortex" for Trucking Industry

bit.ly

In this episode of Cause for Action, Nathan Morris, senior vice president, legal reform advocacy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform, is joined by Lee Parsley, the general couns...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

2 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

TLR General Counsel Lee Parsley joined the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform podcast to discuss nuclear verdicts in the trucking industry and what legislators can do to ensure that excessive lawsuits don't shut down this vital industry. Listen and share: bit.ly/3wjgKJ9 ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Nuclear Verdicts Create Litigation "Vortex" for Trucking Industry

bit.ly

In this episode of Cause for Action, Nathan Morris, senior vice president, legal reform advocacy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform, is joined by Lee Parsley, the general couns...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter

lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
18h 1527046564635721728

Want to make a difference in the fight against lawsuit abuse? Join the TLR team today! #stoplawsuitabuse

Get Involved

Texans for Lawsuit Reform has thousands of supporters from across Texas who are committed to a fair and balanced civil justice system.

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1527046564635721728Retweet on Twitter 1527046564635721728Like on Twitter 1527046564635721728Twitter 1527046564635721728
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
24h 1526956133377789952

The Dallas County DA argued a judge’s impartiality could be questioned after she lowered a defendant’s bail while his defense lawyer is one of her top campaign contributors and then raised his bail after media reports about her rulings. Read & RT:

Dallas judge under scrutiny for bail rulings recuses herself from cases

Judge Chika Anyiam, of Criminal District Court 7, recused herself Monday from 10 felony cases against Julio Guerrero. A Dallas County judge who faced ...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1526956133377789952Retweet on Twitter 15269561333777899521Like on Twitter 1526956133377789952Twitter 1526956133377789952
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
17 May 1526684119077371904

TLR is working to make the Texas legal system fair, efficient, and accessible for all. Learn more: #tortreform

About - Texans for Lawsuit Reform

TLR's objective is to restore litigation to its traditional and appropriate role in our society. A lawsuit takes a heavy emotional and financial toll ...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1526684119077371904Retweet on Twitter 1526684119077371904Like on Twitter 1526684119077371904Twitter 1526684119077371904

Texans for Lawsuit Reform
1701 Brun Street
Houston, Texas 77019

Ph. 713-963-9363
  • About TLR
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
  • For the Record
  • Special Reports
  • In the News
  • Press Releases
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Get Involved
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
  • Contact TLR

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform.
All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy