Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Through political action, legal, academic and market research, and grassroots initiatives, TLR fights for common-sense reforms that keep Texas open for business.

  • About TLR
    • Our Mission
    • Our Team
    • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
    • Special Reports
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • The Advocate
    • TLR Blog: For the Record
  • Get Involved
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
In the News

Capitol conundrum: Should Texas change how judges are elected?

Austin American Statesman, April 19, 2019

By: Chuck Lindell

To get elected and reelected to office, many Texas judges seek campaign contributions from lawyers and law firms that might have business before their courts, undermining public confidence in their rulings and the goal of impartial justice.

But while many denounce the situation — including judges and lawyers trapped in the political donation cycle — there is little consensus at the Texas Legislature about how to address it.

A Capitol hearing last week displayed the difficult issues involved in changing an almost 150-year-old system that requires judges to run for office every four or six years.

Rep. Brooks Landgraf, R-Odessa, proposed a bill to create an 11-member advisory board to rate gubernatorial nominees for local and statewide judges as “highly qualified, “qualified” or “unqualified.” After gaining approval from two-thirds of the Texas Senate, the judges would run every four years in nonpartisan retention elections where voters decide whether they should remain in office.

High-profile support from three current and former chief justices of the Texas Supreme Court was met with sharp opposition from other judges, public-interest groups and advocates who said voters should not be cut out from the initial process of choosing judges.

Democrats at the hearing also were skeptical about the timing of the bill, noting that Republican complaints about judicial selection grew in intensity after Democrats swept many GOP judges from office in the 2018 election.

Supreme Court Chief Justice Nathan Hecht, joined by former chief justices Wallace Jefferson and Tom Phillips, urged lawmakers to take steps to remove politics from judicial elections and said Landgraf’s House Bill 4504 was a good place to start.

“If you want judges who rule in favor of Republicans or Democrats, in favor of the left or the right, in favor of the establishment or outsiders, in favor of the rich or the poor, then we should keep partisan elections,” Hecht, a Republican, told the Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence Committee.

Eventually, he warned, “the powerful will win that struggle.”

Partisan divide
Rep. Yvonne Davis, D-Dallas, noted that Landgraf’s bill would have the Republican governor nominate judges. Those nominees would be vetted by an advisory board largely appointed by Republican leaders and approved by the Republican-controlled Texas Senate.

“That is as partisan as you can get,” Davis said during the April 15 hearing on HB 4504.

Landgraf responded that there is no way to completely remove politics from judicial selection. “I try to temper that by requiring a two-thirds majority of the Senate and a nonpartisan retention election,” he said.

Landgraf also said his bill was a starting point and that he expected to make changes based on input from interested parties, committee members and other lawmakers.

“If I am going to complain about the situation, I want to offer a solution, but I don’t expect this to be the final form,” he said.

Landgraf said one of his motivations came from partisan sweeps in district court elections in large counties and in some of the 14 regional courts of appeals — movements that benefited Democrats in 2018 and Republicans earlier this decade but, either way, led to widespread losses in a job where experience is essential.

Hecht also said he was concerned about the loss of experienced judges.

“Judges are not elected or rejected on their merits but on whether they happen to run in the same party as the governor, U.S. senator or the president,” he said. “Literally no one knows all the judges on a large county’s ballot. They vote for a party or a catchy name, or they just don’t vote.”

Jefferson said it’s important that judges be accountable to the citizens of Texas but that too few voters know enough about judicial candidates to make an informed choice — something he learned while campaigning for the Supreme Court.

“The accountability factor broke down because people didn’t know who I was,” he told the committee.

No system is perfect
Other states have responded by adopting some sort of appointment process based on a candidate’s qualifications, followed by retention elections that give voters a say in the process, Phillips said.

Who does the appointing, vetting and approval of the candidates varies by state, and no system is perfect or devoid of politics, he said.

“The fact that any system has holes it … should not be a further excuse to do nothing,” Phillips said.

At the very least, he said, allow judges to run for office without party labels: “Judges should not be labeled by party. It’s not a partisan job.”

But Rep. Jessica Farrar, D-Houston, said party affiliation gives voters at least a hint about judicial philosophy and outlook, an important consideration in down-ballot judicial races.

With only about five weeks remaining in the legislative session, it would be difficult for Landgraf’s bill to be changed in time to pass the committee and gain approval in the House and Senate.

However, two less ambitious proposals — HB 3061 and SB 1728 — have passed committees in both houses and would create a commission to study judicial selection and recommend changes for the 87th Legislature to adopt when it convenes in 2021.

Follow us on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

3 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

In case you missed it: Specialized business courts like the Delaware Court of Chancery can be an important addition to a state’s economic foundation. These courts quickly and expertly handle complex business litigation, freeing up other courts to handle other types of cases. Read and share: bit.ly/3y7zwnI ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Making Business Our Business

bit.ly

Much has been written about Elon Musk—eccentric billionaire, CEO of some of the most innovative companies in the world and… future owner of Twitter? While the nuances of this deal are daily fodder...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

4 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

The federal judge who supervises multidistrict opioid litigation had ordered a certain percentage of future opioid settlements to be set aside for plaintiffs’ lawyers who have similar cases outside the MDL, diverting more settlement money away from the victims. Read & share: bit.ly/3NqcDQP ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Multidistrict Opioid Litigation Continues to Enrich Plantiffs' Lawyers

bit.ly

Multidistrict opioid litigation is once again being used to the advantage of plaintiffs’ lawyers. This very serious issue requires a victims-first approach, not a plaintiffs’-lawyer-payday-first a...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 1
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

5 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

A month passed before Harris County courts brought in 18-year-old Corey Hodges, who violated his bond conditions 37 times. Crime Stoppers’ Andy Kahan blames the initial judge's lack of enforcement on his first bond violation back in 2015. Read and share: bit.ly/3A6vLjC ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

18-year-old charged with murder, aggravated assault violates bond conditions at least 37 times

bit.ly

HARRIS COUNTY, Texas – 18-year-old Corey Hodge could be a poster guy for Breaking Bond. “This is clearly you are breaking your bond conditions,” said Andy Kahan with Crime Stoppers. On April 17,...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 1
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter

lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
1 Jul 1542991625462464513

TLR is working to make the Texas legal system fair, efficient, and accessible for all. Learn more: #tortreform #stoplawsuitabuse

About - Texans for Lawsuit Reform

TLR's objective is to restore litigation to its traditional and appropriate role in our society. A lawsuit takes a heavy emotional and financial toll ...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1542991625462464513Retweet on Twitter 1542991625462464513Like on Twitter 1542991625462464513Twitter 1542991625462464513
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
1 Jul 1542901497490456578

#ICYMI: Certain business courts like the Delaware Court of Chancery can be an important addition to a state’s economic foundation. These courts quickly & expertly handle complex business litigation freeing up other courts to handle other cases. Read & RT:

Making Business Our Business

Much has been written about Elon Musk—eccentric billionaire, CEO of some of the most innovative companies in the world and… future owner of Twitte...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1542901497490456578Retweet on Twitter 15429014974904565781Like on Twitter 1542901497490456578Twitter 1542901497490456578
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
30 Jun 1542629262443905024

Fighting lawsuit abuse keeps our courts fair and our economy strong. Learn more →

About - Texans for Lawsuit Reform

TLR's objective is to restore litigation to its traditional and appropriate role in our society. A lawsuit takes a heavy emotional and financial toll ...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1542629262443905024Retweet on Twitter 1542629262443905024Like on Twitter 1542629262443905024Twitter 1542629262443905024

Texans for Lawsuit Reform
1701 Brun Street
Houston, Texas 77019

Ph. 713-963-9363
  • About TLR
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
  • For the Record
  • Special Reports
  • In the News
  • Press Releases
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Get Involved
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
  • Contact TLR

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform.
All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy