Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Through political action, legal, academic and market research, and grassroots initiatives, TLR fights for common-sense reforms that keep Texas open for business.

  • About TLR
    • Our Mission
    • Our Team
    • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
    • Special Reports
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • The Advocate
    • TLR Blog: For the Record
    • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Get Involved
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
In the News

Climate-Change ‘Lawfare’: Texas Judges Take Swipe at California’s Liberal Courts, Reluctantly Ruling Against Exxon

Law.com, June 19, 2020

Justices on Fort Worth’s Second Court of Appeals in a recent ruling called climate-change litigation against Exxon Mobil Corp. “lawfare” and lamented that California courts hearing the lawsuits may join the “battlefield” when conservative Texas courts would not.

In the case, Exxon was litigating to obtain pre-lawsuit depositions to see if California litigation against it regarding climate change was brought in bad faith, just to try to suppress the company’s speech on climate change.

Exxon’s allegations and deposition request targeted a Massachusetts-based climate change litigator, and a group of California cities, counties, and their in-house attorneys and officials.

‘Enlisting the judiciary’
The Second Court’s three-justice panel threw out Exxon’s request to do the depositions because they found Texas courts don’t have jurisdiction over the California parties, since none of their actions happened in the Lone Star State and they didn’t significantly contact or target Texans.

Yet the final two pages of the 49-page majority ruling made it clear the justices really wanted to side with Exxon.

Justice Elizabeth Kerr, joined by Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth and Justice J. Wade Birdwell, confessed to “an impulse to safeguard an industry that is vital to Texas’s economic well-being,” the opinion said.

“Lawfare is an ugly tool by which to seek the environmental policy changes the California parties desire, enlisting the judiciary to do the work that the other two branches of government cannot or will not do to persuade their constituents that anthropogenic climate change has been conclusively proved and must be remedied by crippling the energy industry,” the opinion said.

Noting that the Second Court is very conservative and follows settled legal principles, the ruling cast some doubt about what the California courts in the climate-change litigation might do.

“California courts might well be philosophically inclined to join the lawfare battlefield in ways far different than Texas courts,” the ruling said.

At the highest levels of the nation’s judiciary, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. has frowned upon politicians who use partisan attacks to criticize judicial rulings. In public remarks he’s said judges don’t sit on opposite sides of the isle or serve one party or interest. He has said there are no “Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges.”

Strategic attacks on Exxon?
Exxon might appeal the loss.

“The court recognized that municipalities suing energy companies over climate change are engaged in ‘Lawfare,’” Exxon spokesman Casey Norton wrote in a statement. “We are reviewing the court’s decision and are evaluating our appellate options.”

The California cities involved in the dispute are San Francisco, Oakland, Imperial Beach and Santa Cruz, and the counties are San Mateo, Marin and Santa Cruz. The case also includes city and county attorneys, other government officials and two of the cities’ outside counsel—climate change litigator Matthew Pawa of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro in Newton, Massachusetts.

McKool Smith Principal Robert Manley, who represented the cities, didn’t immediately return an email seeking comment. The counties’ attorney, Pete Marketos, partner in Reese Marketos in Dallas, didn’t immediately return a call. Stanley Law Group President Marc Stanley of Dallas, who represents Pawa, declined comment.

Exxon alleged that Pawa in the past formulated a legal strategy to sue energy companies for creating a climate change, a public nuisance, and then communicated the strategy to states and cities that sued the company.

The California parties sued Exxon in California in 2017. The case alleged that fossil-fuel emissions caused global warming, rising sea-levels, coastal flooding, erosion and salt-water intrusion. They said Exxon knew its products caused the damage, yet continued to produce and sell them, the opinion said.

Exxon claimed that in bond offering statements, the California parties contradicted claims they had made in the lawsuits. That’s why the energy company alleged the lawsuits were really trying to silence and delegitimize Exxon, the opinion said. Pawa’s involvement was further evidence that the cases were brought for an improper purpose, claimed Exxon.

‘Blessing and curse’
Arguments arose about the court’s jurisdiction. Even though a Tarrant County trial court ruled that it did have jurisdiction to decide if Exxon could depose the parties, the Second Court reversed that decision.

But not because they wanted to do it.

“Being a conservative panel on a conservative intermediate court in a relatively conservative part of Texas is both blessing and curse: blessing, because we strive always to remember our oath to follow settled legal principles set out by higher courts,” the opinion said. “Curse, because in this situation, at this time in history, we would very much like to follow our impulse instead.”

In a concurring opinion, Sudderth wrote, “Doing one’s job and abiding by rules is not always a comfortable path.”

She urged the Texas Supreme Court to reexamine the jurisdictional precedent that caused the court to rule this way.

Follow us on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

This message is only visible to admins:
Problem displaying Facebook posts. Backup cache in use.

Error: Error validating access token: The user has not authorized application 1332798716823516.
Type: OAuthException
Click here to Troubleshoot.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

3 weeks ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Trucking officials and tort reform advocates in Texas have introduced legislation seeking to end schemes between plaintiff attorneys and doctors under which medical costs related to truck accidents are overstated in court litigation, a practice that critics charge is contributing to a rise in large jury verdicts and lawsuit settlements against trucking companies. Read and share: bit.ly/38XtgRz ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Texas Truckers Fight Inflated Medical Costs in Litigation

bit.ly

Trucking officials and tort reform advocates in Texas have introduced legislation seeking to end schemes between plaintiff attorneys and doctors under which medical costs related to truck accidents ar...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

3 weeks ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

“Our goals are simply to improve the fairness and efficiency of Florida’s civil justice system, to relieve parties from the expense and burdens of meritless litigation, and to save the work of juries for cases where there are real factual disputes that need resolution.” Read and share: bit.ly/3595BN3 ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Florida Supreme Court delivers the ‘Holy Grail of lawsuit reform’ in Thursday ruling

bit.ly

The Florida Supreme Court on Thursday revamped a key legal standard as its conservative majority continued to show a willingness to undo previous decisions that have guided the state’s courts. “Ou...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

3 weeks ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Some prominent business defense lawyers, reacting to a recent Wall Street Journal (WSJ) report about the relatively paltry number of COVID-19 exposure lawsuits to date, say we are merely at the starting gate for virus-related injury claims. Read and share: bit.ly/3b7TvYg ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Business defense attorneys warn that dearth of Covid exposure lawsuits no barometer for what’s coming

bit.ly

Some prominent business defense lawyers, reacting to a recent Wall Street Journal (WSJ) report about the relatively paltry number of Covid-19 exposure lawsuits to date, say we are merely at the starti...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 1
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter

lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
22 Jan 1352739089573945344

Sign up for the TLR Weekly News Roundup to receive a daily digest of headlines & news stories about lawsuit reform from Texas & around the country!

Sign up for the TLR Weekly News Roundup!

Please use the form below to receive a daily digest of TLR Clips - headlines and news stories about lawsuit reform from Texas and around the country.

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1352739089573945344Retweet on Twitter 1352739089573945344Like on Twitter 13527390895739453441Twitter 1352739089573945344
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
22 Jan 1352663609717960705

#ICYMI: Trucking officials & #tortreform advocates in Texas introduced legislation seeking to end schemes between plaintiff attorneys & doctors under which medical costs related to truck accidents are overstated in court litigation. Read & RT: #tortreform

Texas Truckers Fight Inflated Medical Costs in Litigation

Trucking officials and tort reform advocates in Texas have introduced legislation seeking to end schemes between plaintiff attorneys and doctors under...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1352663609717960705Retweet on Twitter 1352663609717960705Like on Twitter 13526636097179607051Twitter 1352663609717960705
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
21 Jan 1352391794013700096

TLR has thousands of supporters across Texas who are committed to a fair and balanced civil justice system. Join our team today!

Get Involved - Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Texans for Lawsuit Reform has thousands of supporters from across Texas who are committed to a fair and balanced civil justice system.

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1352391794013700096Retweet on Twitter 1352391794013700096Like on Twitter 1352391794013700096Twitter 1352391794013700096

Texans for Lawsuit Reform
1701 Brun Street
Houston, Texas 77019

Ph. 713-963-9363
  • About TLR
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
  • For the Record
  • Special Reports
  • In the News
  • Press Releases
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Get Involved
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
  • Contact TLR

Copyright © 2021 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform.
All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy