Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Through political action, legal, academic and market research, and grassroots initiatives, TLR fights for common-sense reforms that keep Texas open for business.

  • About TLR
    • Our Mission
    • Our Team
    • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
    • Special Reports
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • The Advocate
    • TLR Blog: For the Record
  • Get Involved
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
In the News

Could This Anti-SLAPP Ruling Help Lawyers Dismiss Attorney Discipline Cases?

Texas Lawyer, April 3, 2019

By: Angela Morris

A ruling Wednesday by Austin’s Third Court of Appeals finding that an anti-SLAPP law applied to an attorney ethics case will open the flood gates for lawyers looking dismiss disciplinary charges against them, one justice warned in a concurring opinion.

The majority opinion by the Texas appellate court reinstated the attorney discipline case against Omar Rosales, but not before making a significant finding: that a defendant in an attorney ethics case could rely on anti-SLAPP legislation, which allows early dismissal in First Amendment cases.

Rosales allegedly broke ethics rules by sending misleading and deceitful letters to medical providers regarding their websites’ compliance with the Americans with Disabilities act. But he had successfully argued that the state’s anti-SLAPP law protected him from the allegations by the State Bar of Texas Commission for Lawyer Discipline.

The appellate court in Commission for Lawyer Discipline v. Rosales found the Texas Citizens Participation Act, the state’s anti-SLAPP law, applies to lawyer discipline cases, even though the bar’s disciplinary commission argued otherwise. Yet after weighing the specifics of Rosales’ case, it overturned the dismissal because it ruled that the bar had shown enough evidence for a prima facie case against the attorney.

Gaines West, who represents Rosales, said it’s a good opinion because it ruled the TCPA does apply to lawyer grievances. He wrote in a statement that Rosales would appeal the ruling to the Texas Supreme Court, because it was incorrect for the Third Court to find the commission established its case with clear and specific evidence, and incorrect that Rosales failed to establish defenses to the claims.

Not everyone agrees the anti-SLAPP law should come into play in the lawyer discipline system. Justice Chari Kelly, in a concurring opinion, likened the case to “Alice in Wonderland,” saying we’re “through a looking glass” if a  law meant to protect free speech, association and petitioning the government is now being used as a barrier in attorney discipline cases. She agreed with the majority’s end result in the case, but not its reasoning.

She wrote that the anti-SLAPP law shouldn’t trump the Texas Supreme Court’s authority to set rules for grievance proceedings, nor the statute that governs lawyer discipline.

“It should not go unnoticed that the majority’s ruling will only encourage attorneys facing discipline to file TCPA motions to dismiss as a way of delaying their proceedings,” she wrote. “This court will be faced with more and more TCPA appeals in disciplinary proceedings. There is no free speech right, right of association, or right of petition for lawyers to violate the disciplinary rules. The purpose of the disciplinary rules is to protect the public from unethical lawyers.”

The tort reform group Texans for Lawsuit Reform has supported a bill, HB 2730, that would narrow the scope of the anti-SLAPP law. TLR singled out Rosales’ case as an example of the law going too far, touching on matters the legislature never intended to impact.

The majority opinion by Chief Justice Jeff Rose, however, noted that the commission did argue on appeal that the TCPA wouldn’t apply in lawyer discipline cases. The court disagreed, noting the law lists four entities which bring government-enforcement actions that are exempt from the law, yet the commission was not among them.

“If the legislature had intended to exempt lawyer-discipline enforcement actions brought by the commission through the chief disciplinary counsel, it could have included text to that effect,” Rose wrote.

However, the commission also argued the trial court shouldn’t have dismissed its case because it had established enough evidence for each of its claims against Rosales. In this situation, the anti-SLAPP law bars courts from dismissing a case.

Rose wrote that the commission’s detailed pleadings did carry the burden of establishing evidence of the claims for the purposes of the anti-SLAPP law. The opinion noted that the TCPA gives defendants a chance to assert evidence of a valid defense of claims, and still win a dismissal. Rose wrote that the defenses Rosales raised on appeal were self-serving and conclusory, and hadn’t raised any fact issue, or established enough evidence of his defense.

Claire Mock, a spokeswoman for the bar’s Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel, which represents the commission, declined to comment.

Follow us on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

3 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

In case you missed it: Specialized business courts like the Delaware Court of Chancery can be an important addition to a state’s economic foundation. These courts quickly and expertly handle complex business litigation, freeing up other courts to handle other types of cases. Read and share: bit.ly/3y7zwnI ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Making Business Our Business

bit.ly

Much has been written about Elon Musk—eccentric billionaire, CEO of some of the most innovative companies in the world and… future owner of Twitter? While the nuances of this deal are daily fodder...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

4 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

The federal judge who supervises multidistrict opioid litigation had ordered a certain percentage of future opioid settlements to be set aside for plaintiffs’ lawyers who have similar cases outside the MDL, diverting more settlement money away from the victims. Read & share: bit.ly/3NqcDQP ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Multidistrict Opioid Litigation Continues to Enrich Plantiffs' Lawyers

bit.ly

Multidistrict opioid litigation is once again being used to the advantage of plaintiffs’ lawyers. This very serious issue requires a victims-first approach, not a plaintiffs’-lawyer-payday-first a...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 1
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

5 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

A month passed before Harris County courts brought in 18-year-old Corey Hodges, who violated his bond conditions 37 times. Crime Stoppers’ Andy Kahan blames the initial judge's lack of enforcement on his first bond violation back in 2015. Read and share: bit.ly/3A6vLjC ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

18-year-old charged with murder, aggravated assault violates bond conditions at least 37 times

bit.ly

HARRIS COUNTY, Texas – 18-year-old Corey Hodge could be a poster guy for Breaking Bond. “This is clearly you are breaking your bond conditions,” said Andy Kahan with Crime Stoppers. On April 17,...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 1
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter

lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
1 Jul 1542991625462464513

TLR is working to make the Texas legal system fair, efficient, and accessible for all. Learn more: #tortreform #stoplawsuitabuse

About - Texans for Lawsuit Reform

TLR's objective is to restore litigation to its traditional and appropriate role in our society. A lawsuit takes a heavy emotional and financial toll ...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1542991625462464513Retweet on Twitter 1542991625462464513Like on Twitter 1542991625462464513Twitter 1542991625462464513
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
1 Jul 1542901497490456578

#ICYMI: Certain business courts like the Delaware Court of Chancery can be an important addition to a state’s economic foundation. These courts quickly & expertly handle complex business litigation freeing up other courts to handle other cases. Read & RT:

Making Business Our Business

Much has been written about Elon Musk—eccentric billionaire, CEO of some of the most innovative companies in the world and… future owner of Twitte...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1542901497490456578Retweet on Twitter 15429014974904565781Like on Twitter 1542901497490456578Twitter 1542901497490456578
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
30 Jun 1542629262443905024

Fighting lawsuit abuse keeps our courts fair and our economy strong. Learn more →

About - Texans for Lawsuit Reform

TLR's objective is to restore litigation to its traditional and appropriate role in our society. A lawsuit takes a heavy emotional and financial toll ...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1542629262443905024Retweet on Twitter 1542629262443905024Like on Twitter 1542629262443905024Twitter 1542629262443905024

Texans for Lawsuit Reform
1701 Brun Street
Houston, Texas 77019

Ph. 713-963-9363
  • About TLR
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
  • For the Record
  • Special Reports
  • In the News
  • Press Releases
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Get Involved
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
  • Contact TLR

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform.
All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy