Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Through political action, legal, academic and market research, and grassroots initiatives, TLR fights for common-sense reforms that keep Texas open for business.

  • About TLR
    • Our Mission
    • Our Team
    • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
    • Special Reports
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • The Advocate
    • TLR Blog: For the Record
  • Get Involved
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
In the News

Doing business and paying taxes in Texas does not create Texas jurisdiction over out-of-state companies, appeals court says

Southeast Texas Record, October 23, 2017

By: Karen Kidd

A non-Texas company may seek out and do business with Texas companies and pay Texas taxes but that isn’t enough for that company to fall under the jurisdiction of Texas courts, according to a recent opinion from a state appeals court.

Phone calls and emails between companies on opposite sides of the Texas state border is not enough to grant Texas court jurisdiction over the nonnative company, according to the 16-page opinion handed down Oct. 10 by Texas’ 1st District Court of Appeals.

“And, it is well-established that contracting with a Texas resident, without more, is insufficient to establish jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant, particularly, as here, where the alleged agreement at issue calls for performance outside of Texas,” the opinion said. “We conclude that OmniSource has negated all bases for an assertion of specific jurisdiction over it.”

The appeals court overruled the sole issue raised by plaintiff Omar Salgado, injured at a Louisiana worksite in 2014, and affirmed a lower court’s order that granted a special appearance to OmniSource Corp. and dismissed Salgado’s claims. In his appeal to the 1st District, Salgado claimed OmniSource had “negligently hired” another defendant, CS Metals, located in Houston, and that the 295th District Court of Harris County was wrong to grant special appearance to OmniSource.

OmniSource Corp. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Steel Dynamics founded in Fort Wayne, Indiana about 65 years ago, according to OmniSource’s website.

In his fourth amended petition in the case, Salgado claimed the serious injuries he suffered Nov. 6, 2014, when a large piece of metal struck him at a demolition site in Morgan City, Louisiana were the result of negligence of OmniSoure, among other defendants.

OmniSource, the only defendant in Saldago’s original case not headquartered in Texas, filed for a special appearance with the lower court, claiming that Texas does not have general or specific jurisdiction over it, according to the appeals court’s opinion. Exercising jurisdiction over OmniSource in Texas “would offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice,” the opinion said.

Salgado argued that OmniSource does fall under the jurisdiction of Texas courts because OmniSource seeks out and transacts business in Texas, has filed franchise tax reports in the state since 2006 and has been party to lawsuits in Texas, both as a plaintiff and as a defendant, according to the opinion. OmniSource’s counsel countered that doing business in the state, having Texas customers and paying taxes “is not sufficient to show continuous and systematic contacts that satisfy due process,” the opinion said.

A court may assert personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant once requirements of the due process clause of the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment and the Texas long-arm statute are satisfied, according to the opinion.

“Saldago’s assertions about specific jurisdiction all concern an agreement between OmniSource and CS Metals that was to be performed in Louisiana,” the opinion said. “Salgado places much significance on his assertion that this agreement was negotiated, and CS Metals was hired, while it was located in Houston, Texas. He insists that his allegation that OmniSource negligently hired CS Metals is sufficient to defeat OmniSource’s special appearance.”

However, Salgado made no allegation and presented no evidence that OmniSource representatives traveled to Texas for contract negotiations with CS Metals “or performed any allegedly tortious acts in Texas as part of these negotiations,” the opinion said.

“Phone calls and emails with CS Metals, a Texas resident, as part of the negotiation process do not constitute sufficient proof of purposeful availment by OmniSource in this case,” the court stated.

Follow us on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

3 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

In case you missed it: Specialized business courts like the Delaware Court of Chancery can be an important addition to a state’s economic foundation. These courts quickly and expertly handle complex business litigation, freeing up other courts to handle other types of cases. Read and share: bit.ly/3y7zwnI ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Making Business Our Business

bit.ly

Much has been written about Elon Musk—eccentric billionaire, CEO of some of the most innovative companies in the world and… future owner of Twitter? While the nuances of this deal are daily fodder...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

4 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

The federal judge who supervises multidistrict opioid litigation had ordered a certain percentage of future opioid settlements to be set aside for plaintiffs’ lawyers who have similar cases outside the MDL, diverting more settlement money away from the victims. Read & share: bit.ly/3NqcDQP ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Multidistrict Opioid Litigation Continues to Enrich Plantiffs' Lawyers

bit.ly

Multidistrict opioid litigation is once again being used to the advantage of plaintiffs’ lawyers. This very serious issue requires a victims-first approach, not a plaintiffs’-lawyer-payday-first a...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 1
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

5 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

A month passed before Harris County courts brought in 18-year-old Corey Hodges, who violated his bond conditions 37 times. Crime Stoppers’ Andy Kahan blames the initial judge's lack of enforcement on his first bond violation back in 2015. Read and share: bit.ly/3A6vLjC ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

18-year-old charged with murder, aggravated assault violates bond conditions at least 37 times

bit.ly

HARRIS COUNTY, Texas – 18-year-old Corey Hodge could be a poster guy for Breaking Bond. “This is clearly you are breaking your bond conditions,” said Andy Kahan with Crime Stoppers. On April 17,...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 1
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter

lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
1 Jul 1542991625462464513

TLR is working to make the Texas legal system fair, efficient, and accessible for all. Learn more: #tortreform #stoplawsuitabuse

About - Texans for Lawsuit Reform

TLR's objective is to restore litigation to its traditional and appropriate role in our society. A lawsuit takes a heavy emotional and financial toll ...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1542991625462464513Retweet on Twitter 1542991625462464513Like on Twitter 1542991625462464513Twitter 1542991625462464513
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
1 Jul 1542901497490456578

#ICYMI: Certain business courts like the Delaware Court of Chancery can be an important addition to a state’s economic foundation. These courts quickly & expertly handle complex business litigation freeing up other courts to handle other cases. Read & RT:

Making Business Our Business

Much has been written about Elon Musk—eccentric billionaire, CEO of some of the most innovative companies in the world and… future owner of Twitte...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1542901497490456578Retweet on Twitter 15429014974904565781Like on Twitter 1542901497490456578Twitter 1542901497490456578
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
30 Jun 1542629262443905024

Fighting lawsuit abuse keeps our courts fair and our economy strong. Learn more →

About - Texans for Lawsuit Reform

TLR's objective is to restore litigation to its traditional and appropriate role in our society. A lawsuit takes a heavy emotional and financial toll ...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1542629262443905024Retweet on Twitter 1542629262443905024Like on Twitter 1542629262443905024Twitter 1542629262443905024

Texans for Lawsuit Reform
1701 Brun Street
Houston, Texas 77019

Ph. 713-963-9363
  • About TLR
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
  • For the Record
  • Special Reports
  • In the News
  • Press Releases
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Get Involved
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
  • Contact TLR

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform.
All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy