Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Through political action, legal, academic and market research, and grassroots initiatives, TLR fights for common-sense reforms that keep Texas open for business.

  • About TLR
    • Our Mission
    • Our Team
    • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
    • Special Reports
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • The Advocate
    • TLR Blog: For the Record
  • Get Involved
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
In the News

Fighting a Tort Plague

Wall Street Journal, January 6, 2019

By: The Editorial Board

The Supreme Court’s inconsistent rulings on federal pre-emption of state law have often produced unintended side effects. On Monday the Justices hear a case that could partly remedy one of their muddled decisions that sanctioned state lawsuits against drug manufacturers for label warnings approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

In Merck v. Albrecht, plaintiffs are suing the drug maker for not adequately warning patients of upper-leg fracture risk from its osteoporosis drug Fosamax. Merck ’s proposal to include a warning on its drug label was rejected by the FDA, but plaintiffs argue this should not preclude a lawsuit in state court.

The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act doesn’t expressly pre-empt state torts, and the Court has long held that there is a presumption against federal pre-emption of state laws. But one exception is when it is “physically impossible” to comply with both federal and state regulations. The Court has inconsistently applied this exception, which has produced confusion and a tort epidemic.

Consider the Court’s Levine (2009) decision, which involved a label warning for an anti-nausea drug. Plaintiffs sued a drug manufacturer, arguing it should have provided a stronger warning about “IV push injection” though the FDA had approved its label. A 6-3 majority including the Court’s four liberals joined by Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas concluded FDA approval doesn’t protect manufacturers from state torts.

Defendants must provide “clear evidence” that “the FDA would not have approved” the label warning to avoid liability, the Court ruled. In other words, drug makers can be sued for warnings that the FDA deemed were accurate and adequate. This allows the scientific judgments of juries to overrule those of federal drug regulators.

As Justice Samuel Alito explained in his dissent joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Antonin Scalia, “the FDA conveys its warnings with one voice, rather than whipsawing the medical community with 50 (or more) potentially conflicting ones.” He concluded: “Turning a common-law tort suit into a ‘frontal assault’ on the FDA’s regulatory regime for drug labeling upsets the well-settled meaning of the Supremacy Clause and our conflict pre-emption jurisprudence.”

The Court’s liberals are typically sympathetic to trial lawyers, though Justices Kennedy and Thomas appear to have joined for federalism reasons. In his concurrence, Justice Thomas rebuked the “majority’s implicit endorsement of far-reaching implied pre-emption doctrines” and the Court’s practice of invalidating state laws “based on perceived conflicts with broad federal policy objections.”

But he and Justice Kennedy have since joined the Court’s conservatives in two major cases involving federal pre-emption of state drug torts when conflicts were clearer. Albrecht provides an important opportunity for the Court to clarify its jurisprudence.

Starting in 2008, Merck provided the FDA with periodic safety updates on studies linking long-term use of bisphosphonate (the major compound in Fosamax) with atypical femoral fractures and sought to revise its label. But the FDA concluded there was insufficient data to merit a stronger warning. Only after an FDA task force discerned a strong link did the agency support a label revision.

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled for the plaintiffs, holding that a jury might conclude that the FDA rejected Merck’s proposed label warning because of a semantic disagreement. But the FDA said that was not the case. Had Merck heeded the plaintiffs’ demands, it would have violated federal regulations.

Justice Thomas is right that the Court in the past has pre-empted state laws willy-nilly. And as Justice Alito noted in his Levine dissent, “state tort suits can peacefully coexist with the FDA’s labeling regime, and they have done so for decades.” But businesses shouldn’t be looted for complying with federal regulations.

Follow us on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

6 hours ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

When 30-year-old Quinnton Allen violated his parole for possession of a firearm, a Houston judge not only allowed him to stay on parole but granted him a PR bond for a felony. Unfortunately, the decision to release him on bond may have cost a man’s life. Read and share: bit.ly/3OvDU5z ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

29-year-old man murdered after judge grants felony PR bond to armed robber recently paroled from prison

bit.ly

HOUSTON – “I’ve never had any of these defendants we’ve profiled on Breaking Bond on parole and on a felony PR bond charged with murder,” said Andy Kahan with Crime Stoppers. “This is a fi...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 3

Comment on Facebook

That judge should be held accountable

His family should get a good lawyer & sue the city & the judge…

The judge should be held as an accomplice to the murder before the fact and sued in civil court for his contribution to the death of the citizen.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

1 day ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Texas ports are thriving today, but in the early 2000s, abusive personal injury lawsuits threatened to shut them down. As the Port of Houston begins a long-awaited expansion, read more about the common-sense lawsuit reform in 2007 that saved our state’s shipping industry in this week’s TLR blog, For the Record: bit.ly/3aeTy6n ... See MoreSee Less

Learn More

Play
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 4
  • Shares: 2
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

2 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Wishing everyone a very happy Fourth of July! ... See MoreSee Less

Wishing everyone a very happy Fourth of July!
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 5
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 1

Comment on Facebook

Happy Independence Day America Today we celebrate our Republic 🇺🇸


Follow us on Twitter

lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
6h 1544713193846603777

When 30-year-old Quinnton Allen violated his parole for possession of a firearm, a Houston judge not only allowed him to stay on parole but granted him a PR bond for a felony. The decision to release him on bond may have cost a man’s life. Read & RT:

29-year-old man murdered after judge grants felony PR bond to armed robber recently paroled from prison

HOUSTON – “I’ve never had any of these defendants we’ve profiled on Breaking Bond on parole and on a felony PR bond charged with m...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1544713193846603777Retweet on Twitter 1544713193846603777Like on Twitter 1544713193846603777Twitter 1544713193846603777
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
24h 1544441042120089600

Sign up for the TLR Weekly News Roundup to receive a daily digest of headlines & news stories about #lawsuitreform from Texas & around the country!

Sign up for the TLR Weekly News Roundup!

Please use the form below to receive a daily digest of TLR Clips - headlines and news stories about lawsuit reform from Texas and around the country.

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1544441042120089600Retweet on Twitter 1544441042120089600Like on Twitter 15444410421200896001Twitter 1544441042120089600
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
5 Jul 1544407069297614851

Texas ports are thriving, but in the early 2000s, abusive lawsuits threatened to shut them down. Read more about the common-sense reform that saved our state’s shipping industry in this week’s TLR blog, For the Record: https://bit.ly/3aeTy6n

Twitter feed video.
Image for the Tweet beginning: Texas ports are thriving, but
Reply on Twitter 1544407069297614851Retweet on Twitter 15444070692976148512Like on Twitter 1544407069297614851Twitter 1544407069297614851

Texans for Lawsuit Reform
1701 Brun Street
Houston, Texas 77019

Ph. 713-963-9363
  • About TLR
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
  • For the Record
  • Special Reports
  • In the News
  • Press Releases
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Get Involved
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
  • Contact TLR

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform.
All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy