Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Through political action, legal, academic and market research, and grassroots initiatives, TLR fights for common-sense reforms that keep Texas open for business.

  • About TLR
    • Our Mission
    • Our Team
    • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
    • Special Reports
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • The Advocate
    • TLR Blog: For the Record
  • Get Involved
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
In the News

House sends ‘loser pays’ bill to Senate

Austin American Statesman, May 9, 2011

One key change involves home valuation disputes.

By Chuck Lindell

The Texas House on Monday approved a watered-down version of “loser pays” legislation that seeks to add financial penalties for filing frivolous lawsuits.

The bill, approved largely on a party-line vote, could impose a hefty penalty on lawsuit winners, leading to a tongue-in-cheek Democratic amendment to rename it the Loser Pays and Sometimes the Winners Pay Act.

And, thanks to a floor amendment whose passing surprised many, the bill heads to the Senate with a bonus for homeowners who successfully contest property tax appraisals: their court costs and attorney fees would be paid by the losing appraisal district.

Gov. Rick Perry praised the bill, saying it moves Texas “one step closer to implementing a loser pays system that will help expedite legitimate legal claims and crack down on junk lawsuits.”

Perry declared the bill a legislative emergency last week after Democrats temporarily derailed it on a parliamentary technicality known as a point of order.

As originally introduced, the bill would have created a true loser pays system — lawsuit losers would have to pay the other side’s court costs and lawyer fees.

But House Bill 274 was changed in committee to assess legal fees against somebody who files a lawsuit that is tossed out under a so-called motion to dismiss for failing to state a valid legal claim.

Texas is among eight states that do not allow motions to dismiss before evidence is presented in civil court, and the bill would direct the Texas Supreme Court to adopt rules creating that option.

Monday’s House debate was largely devoid of the partisan hostilities that boiled over Saturday when the Republican majority invoked a rarely used rule to pass the loser pays bill on second reading without allowing debate or amendments. Their unusual move was provoked by stalling tactics that the Democratic minority used to derail a number of Republicans’ priority bills.

Democrats focused their objections on changes that could force some lawsuit winners to pay their opponent’s legal costs under the “offer of settlement” rule, which was adopted to encourage pretrial settlements as part of the 2003 tort reform legislation, aimed at limiting the number of civil lawsuits and the size of many damage awards.

The penalty would apply when plaintiffs, or those who file suit, reject a settlement offer and go to trial. If the judge or jury were to award less than 80 percent of the defendant’s settlement offer, the plaintiff would have to pay legal fees accrued by the defense from the time the offer was rejected.

Under current law, the legal fees are capped at no more than 50 percent of economic damages and 100 percent of all other damage awards.

The loser pays bill would strip out the cap. Rep. Craig Eiland, D-Galveston, said that unfairly turns winners into losers who could end up being required to pay more than they won in court.

“This is not about frivolous lawsuits; this is about valid, justifiable lawsuits,” Eiland said. “The jury could find that I was correct in filing that lawsuit, that I was wronged, but I would still end up having to pay their attorney fees.”

Bill supporters say a similar provision protects plaintiffs who make a counteroffer that is rejected. Defendants would have to pay a plaintiff’s legal fees if the court award were 120 percent of the counteroffer.

“This evens the playing field,” said Rep. Brandon Creighton, R-Conroe, the bill’s author.

Because no amendments were allowed during Saturday’s second reading of the bill, Monday’s hearing was the first chance to propose changes from the floor. But House rules require two-thirds approval for amendments to bills on third and final reading, creating a high hurdle that Rep. Roland Gutierrez, D-San Antonio, met with his “taxpayer relief amendment.”

Gutierrez proposed allowing homeowners to collect legal fees when they successfully contest their home values. If the appraisal district wins, however, the agency is entitled to nothing because “they have their own attorneys.”

Rep. Phil King, R-Weatherford, opposed the amendment, saying that while he was sympathetic to its goals, the change would impose a large, unexpected financial burden on taxing districts that would ultimately be paid by taxpayers.

“Our taxes have gone way too high,” Gutierrez responded. “This is a vote to give them the relief they need and send the tax appraiser where he needs to go.”

The amendment passed 100-45.

Follow us on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

7 hours ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

When 30-year-old Quinnton Allen violated his parole for possession of a firearm, a Houston judge not only allowed him to stay on parole but granted him a PR bond for a felony. Unfortunately, the decision to release him on bond may have cost a man’s life. Read and share: bit.ly/3OvDU5z ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

29-year-old man murdered after judge grants felony PR bond to armed robber recently paroled from prison

bit.ly

HOUSTON – “I’ve never had any of these defendants we’ve profiled on Breaking Bond on parole and on a felony PR bond charged with murder,” said Andy Kahan with Crime Stoppers. “This is a fi...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 3

Comment on Facebook

That judge should be held accountable

His family should get a good lawyer & sue the city & the judge…

The judge should be held as an accomplice to the murder before the fact and sued in civil court for his contribution to the death of the citizen.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

1 day ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Texas ports are thriving today, but in the early 2000s, abusive personal injury lawsuits threatened to shut them down. As the Port of Houston begins a long-awaited expansion, read more about the common-sense lawsuit reform in 2007 that saved our state’s shipping industry in this week’s TLR blog, For the Record: bit.ly/3aeTy6n ... See MoreSee Less

Learn More

Play
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 4
  • Shares: 2
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

2 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Wishing everyone a very happy Fourth of July! ... See MoreSee Less

Wishing everyone a very happy Fourth of July!
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 5
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 1

Comment on Facebook

Happy Independence Day America Today we celebrate our Republic 🇺🇸


Follow us on Twitter

lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
40m 1544803550676615169

Join us in pursuing our mission of creating a fair, balanced, and predictable legal system! #lawsuitreform #stoplawsuitabuse

Get Involved

Texans for Lawsuit Reform has thousands of supporters from across Texas who are committed to a fair and balanced civil justice system.

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1544803550676615169Retweet on Twitter 15448035506766151691Like on Twitter 15448035506766151692Twitter 1544803550676615169
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
7h 1544713193846603777

When 30-year-old Quinnton Allen violated his parole for possession of a firearm, a Houston judge not only allowed him to stay on parole but granted him a PR bond for a felony. The decision to release him on bond may have cost a man’s life. Read & RT:

29-year-old man murdered after judge grants felony PR bond to armed robber recently paroled from prison

HOUSTON – “I’ve never had any of these defendants we’ve profiled on Breaking Bond on parole and on a felony PR bond charged with m...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1544713193846603777Retweet on Twitter 1544713193846603777Like on Twitter 1544713193846603777Twitter 1544713193846603777
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
5 Jul 1544441042120089600

Sign up for the TLR Weekly News Roundup to receive a daily digest of headlines & news stories about #lawsuitreform from Texas & around the country!

Sign up for the TLR Weekly News Roundup!

Please use the form below to receive a daily digest of TLR Clips - headlines and news stories about lawsuit reform from Texas and around the country.

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1544441042120089600Retweet on Twitter 1544441042120089600Like on Twitter 15444410421200896001Twitter 1544441042120089600

Texans for Lawsuit Reform
1701 Brun Street
Houston, Texas 77019

Ph. 713-963-9363
  • About TLR
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
  • For the Record
  • Special Reports
  • In the News
  • Press Releases
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Get Involved
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
  • Contact TLR

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform.
All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy