Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Through political action, legal, academic and market research, and grassroots initiatives, TLR fights for common-sense reforms that keep Texas open for business.

  • About TLR
    • Our Mission
    • Our Team
    • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
    • Special Reports
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • The Advocate
    • TLR Blog: For the Record
  • Get Involved
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
In the News

Immunizing Industry Against COVID-19 Liability

National Defense Magazine, October 14, 2020

By Joseph Sobecki

Duty, breach, causation, damages — four words that no law student can forget from their first year torts course, but four words that will likely form the basis of COVID-19 civil negligence claims against employers.

The elements are as simple as an MRE (Meal, Ready-to-Eat), the answers are as complicated as the F-35 supply chain.

Do employers have a duty to protect consumers and employees from COVID-19? While far from legal dictum, businesses should exercise reasonable care in protecting employees and consumers from the virus. If a duty exists, has business breached this duty? Just because an employee or consumer contracts the disease at a business, it does not de facto imply that a business has breached a duty of reasonable care.

The biggest point of contention in any COVID-19 liability case will likely be causation. Legal causation is a high bar to meet. In order to prove causation, plaintiffs need to prove that the breach of a duty to protect consumers or employees is the proximate (direct) cause of COVID-19 transmission. Given that so little is still known about transmission of the virus, this appears to be an extremely high bar to satisfy. Unfortunately, mere exposure to a COVID-19 lawsuit can be financially debilitating to employers and is looming large over employers’ decision to reopen. So, if winning a case at trial is not the answer to COVID-19 liability, what is?

“I voluntarily agree to assume all of the foregoing risks and accept sole responsibility for any injury.” This is the first sentence of a boilerplate waiver that is used across industry for anything from skydiving to renting a car. While signing a waiver satisfies the legal requirements, most of America does not give detailed consideration to the pages of text making up waivers before signing.

Fortunately, in the pre-COVID era waivers of liability were mostly reserved for businesses offering consumers high-risk discretionary recreational activities. Unfortunately, in the post-COVID era businesses are justifiably concerned about liability for decisions as simple as asking paid employees to physically come into work. Also, unfortunately for business, the answer to COVID-19 liability is not as simple as offering employees waivers of liability.

For one, uniformly changing the conditions of employment to include such a waiver would be problematic with many employment contracts. Unilaterally changing the terms of an employment contract can lead to civil liability and other legal issues. The law recognizes that certain activities are inherently dangerous and discretionary; this is why businesses offering high-risk discretionary activities can offer “take it or leave it” waivers of liability to consumers. Going to work isn’t generally accepted as a high-risk discretionary activity. If liability waivers are not an effective COVID-19 “vaccine” for businesses, then what is?

Karri Palmetier, an attorney who works with small- and medium-sized businesses to navigate government contracts in Colorado, said, “if businesses open up and reasonably implement safety precautions, they should not be liable.” Businesses should not have absolute immunity, but in order to stimulate the economy, they need to open. Proposed legislative COVID-19 liability protections for businesses that reasonably implement safety precautions would give companies an incentive to operate in an uncertain environment.

Liability protection does not mean liability immunity. Businesses who blatantly subject employees or consumers to unsafe conditions related to COVID-19 should still have liability.

However, businesses that make a good faith effort to comply with safety standards deserve protection from destructive lawsuits; the costs of defending and potential damages would have disproportionate impacts on small and medium businesses. They should not have to choose between closing or facing the risk of potential litigation.

The stakes are especially high lower down in the defense industrial base supply chain. A local restaurant shutting down is a tragedy. However, this pales in comparison to what happens when the single supplier of a part needed for a complicated system, like the F-35, shuts its doors for good.

Supplier shortages of specialized parts was magnified in July 2019. Even though Turkey has been kicked out of the F-35 program after buying the S-400 Triumf missile system from Russia, Lockheed continued to source parts for the F-35 from Turkish suppliers because of difficulty in acquiring specialized parts from U.S. and allied suppliers. A surge of small and medium businesses closing within the defense industrial base would disrupt production of important military systems, which could potentially be a major national security risk.

Companies across all sectors, and especially in the defense industrial base, serve a vital role in our society. Without business, there is no industry, jobs, or tax revenue.

No business deserves a blank check to put employees — or consumers — at risk by forcing them to return to unsafe production floors where COVID-19 can spread rampant.

Businesses do, however, deserve insulation from a litigation-hungry society looking for a scapegoat. Legislation providing COVID-19 liability protection shields businesses, employees and consumers, while supporting the continued strength and resilience of the defense industrial base. It is unclear if legislation will be the “vaccine” for COVID-19 liability, but it should be part of the dose.

Joseph Sobecki is a junior fellow at the National Defense Industrial Association.

Follow us on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

24 hours ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

The Dallas County DA argued a judge’s impartiality could reasonably be questioned after she lowered a defendant’s bail considerably while his defense lawyer is one of her top campaign contributors, and then raised his bail after media reports about her rulings. Read and share: bit.ly/3lfQMzM ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Dallas judge under scrutiny for bail rulings recuses herself from cases

bit.ly

Judge Chika Anyiam, of Criminal District Court 7, recused herself Monday from 10 felony cases against Julio Guerrero. A Dallas County judge who faced public scrutiny for lowering a murder suspect’s ...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 2
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 1

Comment on Facebook

Tar And Feather

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

2 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

TLR General Counsel Lee Parsley joined the U.S. Chamber’s Institute for Legal Reform’s podcast to discuss nuclear verdicts in the trucking industry and what legislators can do to ensure that excessive lawsuits don't shut down this vital industry. Listen and share: bit.ly/3wjgKJ9 #trucking #lawsuit #LegalNews #courts ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Nuclear Verdicts Create Litigation "Vortex" for Trucking Industry

bit.ly

In this episode of Cause for Action, Nathan Morris, senior vice president, legal reform advocacy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform, is joined by Lee Parsley, the general couns...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

2 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

TLR General Counsel Lee Parsley joined the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform podcast to discuss nuclear verdicts in the trucking industry and what legislators can do to ensure that excessive lawsuits don't shut down this vital industry. Listen and share: bit.ly/3wjgKJ9 ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Nuclear Verdicts Create Litigation "Vortex" for Trucking Industry

bit.ly

In this episode of Cause for Action, Nathan Morris, senior vice president, legal reform advocacy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform, is joined by Lee Parsley, the general couns...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter

lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
18h 1527046564635721728

Want to make a difference in the fight against lawsuit abuse? Join the TLR team today! #stoplawsuitabuse

Get Involved

Texans for Lawsuit Reform has thousands of supporters from across Texas who are committed to a fair and balanced civil justice system.

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1527046564635721728Retweet on Twitter 1527046564635721728Like on Twitter 1527046564635721728Twitter 1527046564635721728
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
24h 1526956133377789952

The Dallas County DA argued a judge’s impartiality could be questioned after she lowered a defendant’s bail while his defense lawyer is one of her top campaign contributors and then raised his bail after media reports about her rulings. Read & RT:

Dallas judge under scrutiny for bail rulings recuses herself from cases

Judge Chika Anyiam, of Criminal District Court 7, recused herself Monday from 10 felony cases against Julio Guerrero. A Dallas County judge who faced ...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1526956133377789952Retweet on Twitter 15269561333777899521Like on Twitter 1526956133377789952Twitter 1526956133377789952
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
17 May 1526684119077371904

TLR is working to make the Texas legal system fair, efficient, and accessible for all. Learn more: #tortreform

About - Texans for Lawsuit Reform

TLR's objective is to restore litigation to its traditional and appropriate role in our society. A lawsuit takes a heavy emotional and financial toll ...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1526684119077371904Retweet on Twitter 1526684119077371904Like on Twitter 1526684119077371904Twitter 1526684119077371904

Texans for Lawsuit Reform
1701 Brun Street
Houston, Texas 77019

Ph. 713-963-9363
  • About TLR
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
  • For the Record
  • Special Reports
  • In the News
  • Press Releases
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Get Involved
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
  • Contact TLR

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform.
All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy