Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Through political action, legal, academic and market research, and grassroots initiatives, TLR fights for common-sense reforms that keep Texas open for business.

  • About TLR
    • Our Mission
    • Our Team
    • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
    • Special Reports
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • The Advocate
    • TLR Blog: For the Record
  • Get Involved
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
In the News

‘Inflammatory’ closing argument should cancel key opioid trial, defendants argue

Legal Newsline, 11/17/2021

CLEVELAND (Legal Newsline) – National pharmacy chains called for a mistrial after the lawyer representing two Ohio counties in closing arguments urged jurors to consider the “national ramifications” of their decision and jokingly suggested they “really go after” any member of the panel who refused to find the defendants liable for causing a public nuisance by dispensing opioids.

The trial represents a key test of the public nuisance theory after the Oklahoma Supreme Court and a California judge rejected the idea companies could cause a public nuisance by selling legal products prescribed by licensed physicians. The judge overseeing federal multidistrict opioid litigation, U.S. District Judge Dan Aaron Polster, interpreted Ohio law differently and ordered pharmacy chains to stand trial for allegedly causing the opioid crisis in Lake and Trumbull counties.

At the conclusion of closing arguments Monday, Walmart, Walgreens and CVS moved for mistrial, saying plaintiff attorney Mark Lanier made “deeply inflammatory and prejudicial remarks,” including telling the jury their decision would impact other lawsuits over the opioid crisis and possibly even lead to criminal investigations of the defendants. At one point in his argument, Lanier also told the jurors defendants are liable.

“I hope that you see it the same way and those who – if there’s some that don’t see it that way, please, those of you who do, I want you not to beat them up, but really go after them,” he said, immediately adding: “No, I’m joking.”

Lanier has swayed juries before, especially when he used a block of cheese to score a staggering verdict against Johnson & Johnson over its Baby Powder.

In a filing arguing against mistrial in the opioid case, plaintiff lawyers said Lanier went on to tell the jury to “debate this” and “come up with the right answer.”

The defendants also objected to Lanier’s repeated reference to the thousands of similar lawsuits by states and municipalities making similar claims against pharmacies, saying the case was “part of a larger picture where we’re trying to figure out who’s responsible and to what degree for the opioid epidemic that plagues not just Northeastern Ohio, but, frankly, plagues most places within the country.”

“Y’all get to form maybe the most seminal case in pharmaceutical history, in pharmacy history, dealing with the Controlled Substances Act,” Lanier said. “That’s you.”

After the pharmacies objected, Judge Polster acknowledged the argument was “a problem” because jurors were supposed to decide only the case before them. The judge told jurors their job was “to decide the issues presented in this case only,” then let the argument proceed.

“Simply telling the jury that it can decide only this case does not mitigate or address the core issue,” the defendants said, which is that they had been told their decision would have impact far beyond the two counties.

The defendants also objected to Lanier’s suggestion the jury’s decision wouldn’t involve money. This is technically true, since Judge Polster decided he will determine the actual damages to be paid if the jury finds the pharmacies liable. (As a public nuisance action, the money will be called “abatement” instead of damages but represents potentially billions of dollars in funding for programs to address the opioid crisis in the two counties.)

“This may be the only civil case you ever get called on where nobody’s asking you for money,” Lanier told the jury. “That’s all in the court’s hands.”

Defendants called the argument “misleading in the extreme, designed to improperly secure a jury verdict.”

Lanier’s statement “could easily be interpreted as an assertion that Defendants face no risk of financial liability from an adverse jury verdict and plaintiffs have little motivation to pursue a lawsuit other than unbridled altruism.”

The plaintiffs, in their objection, cited precedent in the Sixth Circuit, where the trial is taking place, limiting mistrials to cases where attorney misconduct was pervasive throughout the trial. Opioid defendants have objected to plaintiff arguments and the judge’s rulings consistently, however, including winning Sixth Circuit rulings overturning some of Judge Polster’s decisions.

Judge Polster has already refused an earlier request for mistrial after a woman was caught passing out information to her fellow jurors.

Follow us on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

21 hours ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

In case you missed it - 15 Harris County judges resolved fewer felony cases during the pandemic, and all 23 courts have more pending cases now than when the COVID epidemic began. As of March, there were over 48,000 pending active cases in Criminal District Court. Read and share: bit.ly/3yeuPc7 ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

'Do your job,' victim tells judge in Harris County's slowest court

bit.ly

Fifteen judges resolved fewer felony cases during the pandemic and all 23 courts have more pending cases now than when the pandemic began. Harris County Judge Ramona Franklin, of the 338th Criminal Di...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

2 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

The Dallas County DA argued a judge’s impartiality could reasonably be questioned after she lowered a defendant’s bail considerably while his defense lawyer is one of her top campaign contributors, and then raised his bail after media reports about her rulings. Read and share: bit.ly/3lfQMzM ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Dallas judge under scrutiny for bail rulings recuses herself from cases

bit.ly

Judge Chika Anyiam, of Criminal District Court 7, recused herself Monday from 10 felony cases against Julio Guerrero. A Dallas County judge who faced public scrutiny for lowering a murder suspect’s ...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 2
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

3 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

TLR General Counsel Lee Parsley joined the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform podcast to discuss nuclear verdicts in the trucking industry and what legislators can do to ensure that excessive lawsuits don't shut down this vital industry. Listen and share: bit.ly/3wjgKJ9 ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Nuclear Verdicts Create Litigation "Vortex" for Trucking Industry

bit.ly

In this episode of Cause for Action, Nathan Morris, senior vice president, legal reform advocacy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform, is joined by Lee Parsley, the general couns...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter

lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
15h 1527408930703523840

Since TLR’s founding, our supporters have made their voices heard at the Capitol by phone, e-mail, & personal visits on every issue that affects a healthy civil justice system. Make your voice heard & get involved with TLR today!

Get Involved

Texans for Lawsuit Reform has thousands of supporters from across Texas who are committed to a fair and balanced civil justice system.

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1527408930703523840Retweet on Twitter 1527408930703523840Like on Twitter 15274089307035238401Twitter 1527408930703523840
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
21h 1527318698804908040

#ICYMI: 15 Harris County judges resolved fewer felony cases during the pandemic & all 23 courts have more pending cases now than when the COVID epidemic began. As of March, there were over 48,000 pending active cases in Criminal District Court. Read & RT:

'Do your job,' victim tells judge in Harris County's slowest court

Fifteen judges resolved fewer felony cases during the pandemic and all 23 courts have more pending cases now than when the pandemic began. Harris Coun...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1527318698804908040Retweet on Twitter 15273186988049080402Like on Twitter 15273186988049080401Twitter 1527318698804908040
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
18 May 1527046564635721728

Want to make a difference in the fight against lawsuit abuse? Join the TLR team today! #stoplawsuitabuse

Get Involved

Texans for Lawsuit Reform has thousands of supporters from across Texas who are committed to a fair and balanced civil justice system.

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1527046564635721728Retweet on Twitter 1527046564635721728Like on Twitter 1527046564635721728Twitter 1527046564635721728

Texans for Lawsuit Reform
1701 Brun Street
Houston, Texas 77019

Ph. 713-963-9363
  • About TLR
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
  • For the Record
  • Special Reports
  • In the News
  • Press Releases
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Get Involved
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
  • Contact TLR

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform.
All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy