Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Through political action, legal, academic and market research, and grassroots initiatives, TLR fights for common-sense reforms that keep Texas open for business.

  • About TLR
    • Our Mission
    • Our Team
    • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
    • Special Reports
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • The Advocate
    • TLR Blog: For the Record
  • Get Involved
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
In the News

Possible ‘straw man’ donations and sealed lawsuits – questions surrounding Martin Phipps begin to mount

SE Texas Record, November 5, 2019

By David Yates

SAN ANTONIO – If all goes as planned, Martin Phipps, one of the attorneys representing Bexar County in its opioid lawsuit, hopes to stand before a jury next October and ask them to award his client $1 billion in damages.

But before that can happen, Phipps may have to answer some questions, as The Record has obtained documents showing that the attorney may have made “straw man” donations through Jason Reichl, a former Phipps employee who is currently facing criminal charges.

Court records show Reichl was charged with financial theft in March. As of Nov. 5, court records indicated he was awaiting indictment.

And while specifics on the criminal case proved difficult to unearth, records do show that Phipps and his firm, Phipps Deacon Purnell, filed a civil complaint against Reichl on July 11, alleging that he and several other former employees, along with their family members, stole $12.3 million.

A motion to seal, which followed the petition, states that Phipps and his firm have “substantial interests in preventing public disclosure” because the documents contain “personal and sensitive financial information.”

Not every document in the case is under seal, however.

The Record was able to obtain an exhibit, filed on July 12 (the same day as the motion to seal), showing what appears to be several instances of Phipps, through his entity Martin Phipps, PLLC, making “straw man” contributions through Reichl.

Section 253.001 of The Texas Election Code prohibits a contribution or expenditure in another’s name. Violations constitute a Class A misdemeanor.

According to the exhibit, on Dec. 31, 2017, Reichl wrote a $5,000 check to the Monique Diaz for Judge campaign. The names of Jason Reichl and his wife, Andrea Reichl, appear on the check.

Andrea Reichl is also a defendant in Phipps’ suit.

Diaz’s campaign lists the contribution from Andrea, as Reichl had previously maxed out his donations to Diaz’s campaign, records show.

The exhibit shows Reichl submitted an expense voucher for the contribution, which was approved on Jan. 2, 2018. Five days later, Martin Phipps, PLLC issued a reimbursement check to him that appears to include the $5,000 contribution made to Diaz.

The exhibit further shows Reichl submitted an invoice to Martin Phipps, PLLC on Aug. 8, 2017, for reimbursement for an alleged $5,000 contribution to Bexar County Judge Nelson Wolff’s campaign.

Wolff has been quite vocal about his hopes for the county’s opioid lawsuit.

The invoice indicated that it was paid and Reichl submitted an expense voucher requesting repayment for a $5,000 check noted as “NW” (presumably Nelson Wolff), which also appears to have been paid on the reimbursement check of Jan. 7, 2018.

However, it’s possible that Reichl never made the contribution to Wolff’s campaign, as the county judge’s finance chair stated in an affidavit that the campaign did not receive any contributions from Reichl in 2017.

On Sept. 12, 2017, Reichl submitted an expense voucher for reimbursements for political contributions made to Monique Diaz ($5,000) and Patricia Alvarez ($5,000).

Judge Diaz presides over the 150th District Court in Bexar County. Alvarez is the Place 3 judge of the Texas Fourth District Court of Appeals.

Reichl wrote a $5,000 check to Diaz on Sept. 12. 2017, which is reflected on her campaign finance report. That same day, Reichl wrote a $5,000 check to Alvarez, which is also reflected on her campaign finance report.

Martin Phipps, PLLC appears to have reimbursed Reichl for the contributions on Nov. 2, 2017, according to the exhibit.

In addition to possibly violating the prohibition on “straw man” political contributions, the reimbursed contributions to the Diaz and Alvarez campaigns also appear to have evaded the statutory limits on how much money a law firm may stuff into the coffers of judicial candidates.

The campaign finance reports for Diaz and Alvarez reflect that each campaign received a $5,000 contribution from Martin Phipps, PLLC.

$5,000 is the maximum that a law firm entity may contribute to a judge or judicial candidate for a district court bench in Bexar County. There is a separate cap for a law firm group, which includes a firm and its employees.

When the contributions made through Reichl are accounted for, records show that Martin Phipps, PLLC made $15,000 in contributions to the Diaz campaign and $10,000 in contributions to the Alvarez campaign.

Reichl also sought and received reimbursement for a political contribution to San Antonio Mayor Ron Nirenberg’s campaign, the exhibit shows.

Reichl made a $1,000 contribution to Nirenberg’s campaign on June 29, 2018, for which he submitted an expense voucher on July 2, 2018. Martin Phipps, PLLC reimbursed Reichl on July 18, 2018, according to the exhibit.

Nirenberg’s campaign finance report reflects receiving contributions from Reichl as well as Phipps and other employees of Phipps’ firm.

The city of San Antonio has a contribution limit of $1,000 on contributions to mayoral candidates.

Possible “straw man” donations aside, Phipps’ lawsuit against Reichl isn’t the only one the attorney wants to keep from view.

On Oct. 29, Martin Phipps, PLLC filed suit against three individuals with connections to his firm, seeking to secure the return of “its personal property” and “proprietary business information.”

At Phipps’ request, the court temporarily sealed the petition and granted restraining orders against the three defendants, Enrique Casillas, Rebecca Maha and Kimberly Knox.

A hearing on the sealing order has been slated for Nov. 26, court records show.

Phipps did not return requests for comment.

Follow us on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

8 hours ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

In case you missed it: Specialized business courts like the Delaware Court of Chancery can be an important addition to a state’s economic foundation. These courts quickly and expertly handle complex business litigation, freeing up other courts to handle other types of cases. Read and share: bit.ly/3y7zwnI ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Making Business Our Business

bit.ly

Much has been written about Elon Musk—eccentric billionaire, CEO of some of the most innovative companies in the world and… future owner of Twitter? While the nuances of this deal are daily fodder...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

1 day ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

The federal judge who supervises multidistrict opioid litigation had ordered a certain percentage of future opioid settlements to be set aside for plaintiffs’ lawyers who have similar cases outside the MDL, diverting more settlement money away from the victims. Read & share: bit.ly/3NqcDQP ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Multidistrict Opioid Litigation Continues to Enrich Plantiffs' Lawyers

bit.ly

Multidistrict opioid litigation is once again being used to the advantage of plaintiffs’ lawyers. This very serious issue requires a victims-first approach, not a plaintiffs’-lawyer-payday-first a...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 1
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

2 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

A month passed before Harris County courts brought in 18-year-old Corey Hodges, who violated his bond conditions 37 times. Crime Stoppers’ Andy Kahan blames the initial judge's lack of enforcement on his first bond violation back in 2015. Read and share: bit.ly/3A6vLjC ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

18-year-old charged with murder, aggravated assault violates bond conditions at least 37 times

bit.ly

HARRIS COUNTY, Texas – 18-year-old Corey Hodge could be a poster guy for Breaking Bond. “This is clearly you are breaking your bond conditions,” said Andy Kahan with Crime Stoppers. On April 17,...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 1
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter

lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
2h 1542991625462464513

TLR is working to make the Texas legal system fair, efficient, and accessible for all. Learn more: #tortreform #stoplawsuitabuse

About - Texans for Lawsuit Reform

TLR's objective is to restore litigation to its traditional and appropriate role in our society. A lawsuit takes a heavy emotional and financial toll ...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1542991625462464513Retweet on Twitter 1542991625462464513Like on Twitter 1542991625462464513Twitter 1542991625462464513
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
8h 1542901497490456578

#ICYMI: Certain business courts like the Delaware Court of Chancery can be an important addition to a state’s economic foundation. These courts quickly & expertly handle complex business litigation freeing up other courts to handle other cases. Read & RT:

Making Business Our Business

Much has been written about Elon Musk—eccentric billionaire, CEO of some of the most innovative companies in the world and… future owner of Twitte...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1542901497490456578Retweet on Twitter 15429014974904565781Like on Twitter 1542901497490456578Twitter 1542901497490456578
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
30 Jun 1542629262443905024

Fighting lawsuit abuse keeps our courts fair and our economy strong. Learn more →

About - Texans for Lawsuit Reform

TLR's objective is to restore litigation to its traditional and appropriate role in our society. A lawsuit takes a heavy emotional and financial toll ...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1542629262443905024Retweet on Twitter 1542629262443905024Like on Twitter 1542629262443905024Twitter 1542629262443905024

Texans for Lawsuit Reform
1701 Brun Street
Houston, Texas 77019

Ph. 713-963-9363
  • About TLR
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
  • For the Record
  • Special Reports
  • In the News
  • Press Releases
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Get Involved
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
  • Contact TLR

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform.
All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy