Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Through political action, legal, academic and market research, and grassroots initiatives, TLR fights for common-sense reforms that keep Texas open for business.

  • About TLR
    • Our Mission
    • Our Team
    • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
    • Special Reports
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • The Advocate
    • TLR Blog: For the Record
  • Get Involved
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
In the News

Woman loses suit alleging she thought Diet Dr Pepper would help her lose weight

Legal Newsline, April 19, 2018
By: Tomas Kassahun

In a ruling made on March 30, the U.S. District Court Northern District of California dismissed the case of a woman who alleged Diet Dr Pepper’s advertising made her believe the soft drink would help consumers lose weight.

“I agree with its contention that it is not plausible that a reasonable consumer would believe that drinking Diet Dr Pepper would assist in weight loss, beyond the fact that it has no calories,” Judge William H. Orrick wrote.

According to the March 30 court opinion, Shana Becerra believed that Diet Dr Pepper would help in weight loss or healthy weight management due to the use of the term “diet,” but she then learned that artificial sweeteners used in Diet Dr Pepper may cause weight gain.

Becerra filed the lawsuit on behalf of herself and a class of California consumers seeking damages and relief as well as an injunction to stop Dr Pepper/Seven Up Inc. from marketing its Diet Dr Pepper as “diet.”

Dr Pepper moved to transfer the case to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, but the California court said the case belongs in California because “it has a California plaintiff who was injured in California and chose this venue.”

The court, however, granted Dr Pepper’s request to dismiss the plaintiff’s second amended complaint entirely.

According to the opinion, Dr Pepper “uses the term ‘diet’ to market Diet Dr Pepper because the product is sweetened with a non-caloric artificial sweetener, aspartame, rather than sugar.”

Becerra alleged aspartame does not contain calories, “but scientific research demonstrates … that it is likely to cause weight gain.”

Becerra filed suit on behalf of herself and a California class, alleging false and misleading advertising in violation of California’s False Advertising Law, Consumers Legal Remedies Act and Unfair Competition Law, as well as breach of both express and implied warranties.

Dr Pepper said the claims should be dismissed because the claims are expressly preempted by Congress and the Food and Drug Administration approves the use of “diet” as part of a soft drink brand name, like “Diet Dr Pepper,” in the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990.

“The NLEA does not affirmatively approve of the use of ‘diet’ in soft drink brand names like ‘Diet Dr Pepper,’ but instead exempts it from certain labeling requirements to which other nutrition level and health-related claims are subjected,” Orrick wrote.

The opinion added that federal law prohibits state food labeling requirements that are not identical to federal requirements, but the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and California law contain identical prohibitions on false or misleading labeling.

“Given that California law is entirely consistent with and indeed identical to the NLEA, there is no preemption of plaintiff’s claims,” the opinion stated.

Dr Pepper also moved to dismiss plaintiff’s FAL, CLRA and UCL claims on the grounds that they are barred by California’s safe harbor doctrine, but the court said California’s safe harbor doctrine does not bar plaintiff’s claims.

“California’s safe harbor doctrine does not apply because no statute or regulation ‘affirmatively permits’ the use of the term ‘diet’ in soft drink labels,” the opinion stated. “Instead, the NLEA makes it ‘merely not unlawful’ to use the term ‘diet’ if certain conditions are met; compliance with a federal statute or regulation does not establish express authorization.”

Dr Pepper also said the claim of deception is invalid because “no reasonable consumer would be misled by the term ‘diet’ in the context of a diet soft drink, nor do the studies and articles referenced in the complaint establish that Diet Dr Pepper actually causes weight gain.”

The court agreed.

“A reasonable consumer knows that this is and always has been true of soft drinks generally – ‘diet’ soft drinks are simply lower calorie or calorie-free versions of their sugar-laden counterparts,” Orrick wrote. “A reasonable consumer would have no basis to infer anything more from Diet Dr Pepper’s label or advertising than that it is a calorie-free soft drink.”

In regards to the claims for breach of express and implied warranty, the court said “the term “diet” as it appears on Diet Dr Pepper’s label does not create an express warranty to consumers that the product will assist with weight loss.”

The judge denied the motion to transfer, granted the motion to dismiss and allowed Becerra to file an amended complaint within 20 days.

Follow us on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

21 hours ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

In case you missed it - 15 Harris County judges resolved fewer felony cases during the pandemic, and all 23 courts have more pending cases now than when the COVID epidemic began. As of March, there were over 48,000 pending active cases in Criminal District Court. Read and share: bit.ly/3yeuPc7 ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

'Do your job,' victim tells judge in Harris County's slowest court

bit.ly

Fifteen judges resolved fewer felony cases during the pandemic and all 23 courts have more pending cases now than when the pandemic began. Harris County Judge Ramona Franklin, of the 338th Criminal Di...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

2 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

The Dallas County DA argued a judge’s impartiality could reasonably be questioned after she lowered a defendant’s bail considerably while his defense lawyer is one of her top campaign contributors, and then raised his bail after media reports about her rulings. Read and share: bit.ly/3lfQMzM ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Dallas judge under scrutiny for bail rulings recuses herself from cases

bit.ly

Judge Chika Anyiam, of Criminal District Court 7, recused herself Monday from 10 felony cases against Julio Guerrero. A Dallas County judge who faced public scrutiny for lowering a murder suspect’s ...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 2
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

3 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

TLR General Counsel Lee Parsley joined the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform podcast to discuss nuclear verdicts in the trucking industry and what legislators can do to ensure that excessive lawsuits don't shut down this vital industry. Listen and share: bit.ly/3wjgKJ9 ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Nuclear Verdicts Create Litigation "Vortex" for Trucking Industry

bit.ly

In this episode of Cause for Action, Nathan Morris, senior vice president, legal reform advocacy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform, is joined by Lee Parsley, the general couns...
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter

lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
15h 1527408930703523840

Since TLR’s founding, our supporters have made their voices heard at the Capitol by phone, e-mail, & personal visits on every issue that affects a healthy civil justice system. Make your voice heard & get involved with TLR today!

Get Involved

Texans for Lawsuit Reform has thousands of supporters from across Texas who are committed to a fair and balanced civil justice system.

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1527408930703523840Retweet on Twitter 1527408930703523840Like on Twitter 15274089307035238401Twitter 1527408930703523840
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
21h 1527318698804908040

#ICYMI: 15 Harris County judges resolved fewer felony cases during the pandemic & all 23 courts have more pending cases now than when the COVID epidemic began. As of March, there were over 48,000 pending active cases in Criminal District Court. Read & RT:

'Do your job,' victim tells judge in Harris County's slowest court

Fifteen judges resolved fewer felony cases during the pandemic and all 23 courts have more pending cases now than when the pandemic began. Harris Coun...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1527318698804908040Retweet on Twitter 15273186988049080402Like on Twitter 15273186988049080401Twitter 1527318698804908040
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
18 May 1527046564635721728

Want to make a difference in the fight against lawsuit abuse? Join the TLR team today! #stoplawsuitabuse

Get Involved

Texans for Lawsuit Reform has thousands of supporters from across Texas who are committed to a fair and balanced civil justice system.

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1527046564635721728Retweet on Twitter 1527046564635721728Like on Twitter 1527046564635721728Twitter 1527046564635721728

Texans for Lawsuit Reform
1701 Brun Street
Houston, Texas 77019

Ph. 713-963-9363
  • About TLR
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
  • For the Record
  • Special Reports
  • In the News
  • Press Releases
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Get Involved
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
  • Contact TLR

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform.
All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy