Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Through political action, legal, academic and market research, and grassroots initiatives, TLR fights for common-sense reforms that keep Texas open for business.

  • About TLR
    • Our Mission
    • Our Team
    • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
    • Special Reports
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • The Advocate
    • TLR Blog: For the Record
  • Get Involved
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
For the Record

Understanding Texas’ Punitive Damage Cap

A lot has been in the news about the recent verdict in the Alex Jones/Sandy Hook trial. Much of the reporting discusses whether Jones will have to pay the full amount awarded by the jury, or whether Texas’ cap on punitive damages will limit the plaintiffs’ recovery. While the judge in this case hasn’t issued a final judgment, let’s get a refresher on punitive damages in Texas law.

First, there is a difference between compensatory damages—which cover both economic (loss of a job or income) and non-economic damages (impact on a plaintiff’s health or reputation, for example)—and punitive damages. Compensatory damages are meant to make a plaintiff whole.

Punitive damages, on the other hand, are meant to punish the defendant or act as a deterrent for future behavior. These are the damages at issue in this case.

Texas capped punitive damages in 1987. The cap was set at “four times the amount of actual damages or $200,000, whichever is greater.” “Actual damages” was not defined in the statutes, creating ambiguity. 

The Texas Legislature revisited the punitive damages cap in 1995, making a number of changes, including resetting the cap to:

“an amount equal to the greater of: 

(1)(A) two times the amount of economic damages; plus 

 (B) an amount equal to any noneconomic damages found by the jury, not to exceed $750,000; or 

(2) $200,000.

This is the statute that is in place today and governs the plaintiffs’ recovery in the Alex Jones case.  

In 2003, the Legislature added a requirement that a jury be unanimous in awarding punitive damages (HB 4), but the Legislature did not change the cap calculation. 

It’s important to note that these reforms were bipartisan, passed under Democratic majorities in 1987 and 1995 and Republican majorities in 2003. And all three times, the bills were supported by House and Senate leadership from both parties.

But why did Texas cap punitive damages in 1987 in the first place? Because the incumbent system was plainly inequitable. A jury in Lubbock might assess a fraction of the punitive damages assessed by a jury in Beaumont for the same event. Even two juries in the same town hearing cases arising out of the same event might assess vastly different punitive damages. This can be a result of factors such as the location of the injury and the relative skills of the courtroom lawyers.

Additionally, all forms of punishment are capped. If a person is tried for assault, a jury is not allowed to impose any penalty it sees fit to impose. The penalty range is set by statute.

Finally, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that punitive damage awards that are vastly larger than compensatory damage awards are unconstitutional under the Due Process clause. 

Because of these considerations and others, many states cap punitive damage awards. Some states do not allow recovery of punitive damages at all. 

As the Alex Jones case continues to receive media attention, it’s likely Texas’ punitive damage cap will remain in the spotlight. TLR stands ready to provide clarification and resources on this and any other lawsuit reforms passed in the Lone Star State.

Follow us on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

3 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

A great turnout at our 88th Legislative Session Lunch & Learn today! Thanks to all the legislative staffers who joined us to hear about TLR’s agenda this session. ... See MoreSee Less

A  great turnout at our 88th Legislative Session Lunch & Learn today! Thanks to all the legislative staffers who joined us to hear about TLR’s agenda this session.Image attachment
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 2
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

3 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

In case you missed it: Check out the TLR Advocate to read our top priorities for the 88th legislative session, guest columns, and an update on the expanding TLR team. Read and share: bit.ly/3ZHdEva ... See MoreSee Less

In case you missed it: Check out the TLR Advocate to read our top priorities for the 88th legislative session, guest columns, and an update on the expanding TLR team. Read and share: https://bit.ly/3ZHdEva
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

4 days ago

Texans for Lawsuit Reform

Public nuisance lawsuits have expanded beyond their traditional use into a way to regulate through litigation. TLR is dedicated to preventing the public nuisance doctrine from becoming a catch-all cause of action used to impose one person’s political views on society as a whole. Read and share: bit.ly/3ZHdEva ... See MoreSee Less

Public nuisance lawsuits have expanded beyond their traditional use into a way to regulate through litigation. TLR is dedicated to preventing the public nuisance doctrine from becoming a catch-all cause of action used to impose one person’s political views on society as a whole. Read and share: https://bit.ly/3ZHdEva
View on Facebook
·Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 0
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter

lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
3 Feb 1621598756633288707

A great turnout at our 88th Legislative Session Lunch & Learn today! Thanks to all the legislative staffers who joined us to hear about TLR’s agenda this session. #txlege

Twitter feed video.
Image for the Tweet beginning: A  great turnout at
Twitter feed video.
Image for the Tweet beginning: A  great turnout at
Reply on Twitter 1621598756633288707Retweet on Twitter 1621598756633288707Like on Twitter 16215987566332887071Twitter 1621598756633288707
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
3 Feb 1621539669228879873

#ICYMI: Check out the TLR Advocate to read our top priorities for the 88th legislative session, guest columns, and an update on the expanding TLR team. Read and share: https://bit.ly/3ZHdEva

Twitter feed video.
Image for the Tweet beginning: #ICYMI: Check out the TLR
Reply on Twitter 1621539669228879873Retweet on Twitter 1621539669228879873Like on Twitter 1621539669228879873Twitter 1621539669228879873
lawsuitreform avatarTLR@lawsuitreform·
2 Feb 1621267523164426242

TLR is working to make the Texas legal system fair, efficient, and accessible for all. Learn more: #txjustice #txcourts

TLR at a Glance

TLR's objective is to restore litigation to its traditional and appropriate role in our society. A lawsuit takes a heavy emotional and financial toll ...

bit.ly

Reply on Twitter 1621267523164426242Retweet on Twitter 1621267523164426242Like on Twitter 16212675231644262421Twitter 1621267523164426242

Texans for Lawsuit Reform
1701 Brun Street
Houston, Texas 77019

Ph. 713-963-9363
  • About TLR
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Timeline of Reforms
  • Videos
  • Issues
  • Resource Center
  • For the Record
  • Special Reports
  • In the News
  • Press Releases
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Get Involved
  • Invite a TLR Speaker
  • Donate
  • Stay Informed
  • Contact TLR

Copyright © 2023 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Texans for Lawsuit Reform.
All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy